Is it necessary to have Texas in the article title? I can't think of any other Nacogdoches to confuse it with.JonathanMarkoff (talk) 18:21, August 17, 2018 (UTC)

Are you trying to avoid work, bro? TR (talk) 18:34, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
Says the guy who a couple of hours later renames Wilson to Wilson (The House of Daniel) . ML4E (talk) 21:24, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
Well, credit where credit's due--turning Wilson into a disambig makes much more sense than changing the title of this page. TR (talk) 04:55, August 18, 2018 (UTC)
True. However, when I posted my comment, all the update list showed was the one rename which seemed at the time to be particularly inane. ML4E (talk) 16:23, August 18, 2018 (UTC)
Guilty as charged! Sorry about that. When I created the Nacogdoches article two months ago, I left Texas in the wording by mistake since there wasn't a redirect for Texas in Hail! Hail! yet. If anyone wants to rename the article to just Nacogdoches, that's perfectly fine I guess. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 22:00, August 19, 2018 (UTC)
Two out of three admins have already shown no interest in moving the page. The odds of moving are therefore nearly zero. TR (talk) 22:29, August 19, 2018 (UTC)
Make it three. I simply didn't bother commenting because by the time I saw this discussion I saw that TR and ML4E had already shot the silly idea down. Turtle Fan (talk) 06:47, August 21, 2018 (UTC)