User talk:Rri12

Charles III
I quite agree with your speculation on Charles's identity, but while we're not as hardass about enforcing conformity as many other Wikis, we do operate by consensus, and the consensus on this issue is that we should assume Charles is fictional in the absence of further evidence. If you'd like to reopen the discussion, I wish you well; but we can't have people unilaterally reversing the meaning of definitive statements like you did--especially not in the Literary Notes, which generally exist to address very delicate issues where the potential for misunderstanding is high. Turtle Fan 03:57, July 17, 2011 (UTC)