Talk:William Petty-FitzMaurice, 2nd Earl of Shelburne

The length and clumsiness of the new title leads me to believe that before we pursue this further we might want to establish a rule for noblemen who held multiple titles. Perhaps only the highest title will be used? There's precedent: William I of England references kingship of England (And kings are the highest of nobles, are they not? I know we've had this discussion before but I forget the result) but not dukeship over Normandy. Turtle Fan 02:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)