Thread:Drgyen/@comment-1275506-20120717051250/@comment-21519-20120717071257

I haven't the slightest interest in post-IatD projections, thanks to several years of belabored, uninteresting storytelling and then a surprisingly strong finish that wrapped up the themes of the story quite neatly, all combining to indicate that TL-191 had run its course.

I will however inquire about "a Western Hemisphere version of NATO." NATO was set up to check a rival's expanding sphere of influence in Europe. After GWII the US had no rival capable of expanding a sphere of influence in the Americas. Japan might have done so in the Pacific Rim, but that would be of no interest to any WH country in which the US had any good will to speak of: in Quebec, in Haiti, in Chile, in Paraguay, in Brazil, and in Texas assuming the US doesn't just absorb it.

If I may ask, I also must confess a certain curiosity as to why you're just now sharing this with us. Southern Victory ended five years ago. Discussions of this nature were fairly common then. Now it feels like necromancy. Turtle Fan (talk) 07:12, July 17, 2012 (UTC)